Home › Trends8

The Ultimate Comparison: Colby Parkinson Vs. Dalton Schultz

Trends January 10, 2025

Who is the better tight end: Colby Parkinson or Dalton Schultz?

Colby Parkinson and Dalton Schultz are two of the most promising young tight ends in the NFL. Both players have shown flashes of brilliance, and they both have the potential to be stars in this league. But who is the better player? Let's take a closer look at each player and see how they stack up.

Colby Parkinson

Parkinson is a 6'7", 252-pound tight end who was drafted by the Seattle Seahawks in the fourth round of the 2020 NFL Draft. He played college football at Stanford, where he was a two-time All-Pac-12 selection. Parkinson is a gifted athlete with a rare combination of size, speed, and strength. He is also a very good blocker, which makes him a valuable asset in the running game.

Dalton Schultz

Schultz is a 6'5", 245-pound tight end who was drafted by the Dallas Cowboys in the fourth round of the 2018 NFL Draft. He played college football at Stanford, where he was a two-time All-Pac-12 selection. Schultz is a reliable pass-catcher with good hands and a strong frame. He is also a willing blocker, although he is not as good of a blocker as Parkinson.

Who is the better player?

It is difficult to say definitively who is the better player at this point in their careers. Parkinson has more upside, but Schultz has more experience. Ultimately, it will depend on how each player develops over the next few years.

Name	Team	Position
Colby Parkinson	Seattle Seahawks	Tight end
Dalton Schultz	Dallas Cowboys	Tight end

Conclusion

Colby Parkinson and Dalton Schultz are two of the most promising young tight ends in the NFL. Both players have the potential to be stars in this league. It will be interesting to see how each player develops over the next few years.

Colby Parkinson or Dalton Schultz

Size
Athleticism
Blocking
Receiving
Experience
Potential

Detailed discussion on the key aspects

Parkinson has a slight edge in size over Schultz, but Schultz is the more athletic player. Parkinson is a better blocker than Schultz, but Schultz is the better receiver. Schultz has more experience than Parkinson, but Parkinson has more upside.

Ultimately, it is difficult to say definitively who is the better player at this point in their careers. Parkinson has more upside, but Schultz has more experience. It will be interesting to see how each player develops over the next few years.

1. Size

Size is an important factor for tight ends in the NFL. It can be an advantage in both the passing and running game. A bigger tight end can be a more effective blocker, and he can also be a bigger target for his quarterback. Colby Parkinson and Dalton Schultz are both big tight ends, but Parkinson has a slight edge in size. He is 6'7", 252 pounds, while Schultz is 6'5", 245 pounds.

Parkinson's size gives him an advantage in the blocking game. He is able to seal off defenders and create running lanes for his running backs. He is also a good receiver, but his size makes him a difficult matchup for defensive backs. Schultz is also a good receiver, but he is not as big of a target as Parkinson. He is better suited for a possession receiver role, where he can make catches over the middle of the field.

Overall, size is an important factor for tight ends in the NFL. It can be an advantage in both the passing and running game. Colby Parkinson and Dalton Schultz are both big tight ends, but Parkinson has a slight edge in size. This gives him an advantage in the blocking game, but Schultz is the better receiver.

2. Athleticism

Athleticism is a key factor for tight ends in the NFL. It allows them to make plays in all areas of the field, from blocking to receiving. Colby Parkinson and Dalton Schultz are both athletic tight ends, but they have different strengths and weaknesses.

Speed and agility

Speed and agility are important for tight ends who want to be able to get open in the passing game. Parkinson has a slight edge over Schultz in this area. He is able to create separation from defenders with his quickness and burst. Schultz is not as fast as Parkinson, but he is still a good athlete. He is able to use his size and strength to his advantage, and he is a good route runner.

Strength and power

Strength and power are important for tight ends who want to be able to block in the running game. Schultz has a slight edge over Parkinson in this area. He is stronger and more powerful, and he is able to move defenders off the line of scrimmage. Parkinson is not as strong as Schultz, but he is still a good blocker. He is able to use his technique and leverage to his advantage.

Overall, Colby Parkinson and Dalton Schultz are both athletic tight ends. They have different strengths and weaknesses, but they are both capable of making plays in all areas of the field.

3. Blocking

Blocking is an essential skill for tight ends in the NFL. It allows them to protect their quarterback and create running lanes for their running backs. Colby Parkinson and Dalton Schultz are both good blockers, but they have different styles.

Parkinson is a more physical blocker. He uses his size and strength to seal off defenders and create running lanes. He is also a good pass blocker, and he is able to protect his quarterback from oncoming defenders.

Schultz is a more athletic blocker. He uses his quickness and agility to get in front of defenders and seal them off. He is also a good pass blocker, and he is able to use his length to disrupt defenders.

Overall, both Parkinson and Schultz are good blockers. They have different styles, but they are both able to get the job done. Blocking is an important part of the tight end position, and it is one of the things that makes Parkinson and Schultz so valuable to their teams.

4. Receiving

Receiving is a critical skill for tight ends in the NFL. It allows them to be a threat in the passing game and to help their team move the ball down the field. Colby Parkinson and Dalton Schultz are both good receivers, but they have different styles.

Route running
Route running is the ability to run crisp routes and get open against defenders. Parkinson is a good route runner. He is able to create separation from defenders and get open in the passing game. Schultz is also a good route runner, but he is not as quick as Parkinson. He is better suited for short to intermediate routes.
Hands
Hands are important for tight ends who want to be able to catch the ball in traffic. Parkinson has good hands. He is able to make catches in stride and hold on to the ball even when he is hit. Schultz also has good hands, but he is not as reliable as Parkinson. He has been known to drop passes at times.
Contested catches
Contested catches are catches that are made in traffic or when the defender is draped all over the receiver. Parkinson is good at making contested catches. He is able to use his size and strength to outmuscle defenders and come down with the ball. Schultz is not as good at making contested catches as Parkinson, but he is still able to make some tough catches.

Overall, both Parkinson and Schultz are good receivers. They have different styles, but they are both able to make plays in the passing game.

5. Experience

Experience is an important factor for any player in the NFL, but it is especially important for tight ends. Tight ends are often asked to block, receive, and run routes, so they need to have a good understanding of the game and how to play their position. Colby Parkinson and Dalton Schultz are both young tight ends, but they have different levels of experience.

Regular season games played
Parkinson has played in 16 regular season games in his career, while Schultz has played in 49. This gives Schultz a significant advantage in terms of experience. He has seen more different defenses and has had more opportunities to learn from his mistakes.
Playoff games played
Parkinson has not played in any playoff games in his career, while Schultz has played in 4. This gives Schultz another advantage in terms of experience. He has played in big games and knows what it takes to win.
Years in the NFL
Parkinson has been in the NFL for 2 years, while Schultz has been in the NFL for 4 years. This gives Schultz another advantage in terms of experience. He has been around the league longer and has had more time to learn from his coaches and teammates.

Overall, Dalton Schultz has more experience than Colby Parkinson. This gives him an advantage in terms of understanding the game and how to play his position. However, Parkinson is a talented young player with a lot of potential. He has the tools to be a very good tight end in the NFL.

6. Potential

The potential of Colby Parkinson and Dalton Schultz is undeniable. Both players have shown flashes of brilliance in their young careers, and they both have the physical tools to be elite tight ends in the NFL. But what exactly is potential, and how can we measure it?

Physical Potential

Physical potential refers to the natural physical abilities of a player. This includes size, speed, strength, and athleticism. Parkinson and Schultz both have excellent physical potential. They are both big, strong, and athletic players. Parkinson has a slight edge in size, but Schultz is the more athletic player.

Mental Potential

Mental potential refers to the mental abilities of a player. This includes intelligence, football IQ, and work ethic. Parkinson and Schultz both have good mental potential. They are both intelligent players who understand the game of football. Parkinson has a slight edge in football IQ, but Schultz has a better work ethic.

Technical Potential

Technical potential refers to the technical skills of a player. This includes blocking, receiving, and route running. Parkinson and Schultz both have good technical potential. They are both good blockers and receivers. Parkinson has a slight edge in blocking, but Schultz is the better route runner.

Intangible Potential

Intangible potential refers to the intangibles of a player. This includes leadership, competitiveness, and toughness. Parkinson and Schultz both have good intangible potential. They are both leaders on their respective teams. Parkinson has a slight edge in competitiveness, but Schultz is the tougher player.

Overall, Colby Parkinson and Dalton Schultz both have the potential to be elite tight ends in the NFL. They have the physical tools, the mental makeup, and the technical skills to succeed at the highest level. It will be interesting to see how their careers develop over the next few years.

FAQs about Colby Parkinson and Dalton Schultz

Colby Parkinson and Dalton Schultz are two of the most promising young tight ends in the NFL. Both players have shown flashes of brilliance in their young careers, and they both have the potential to be elite tight ends in the league. But which player is better? Let's take a look at some of the most frequently asked questions about Parkinson and Schultz.

Question 1: Who is the better blocker, Colby Parkinson or Dalton Schultz?

Parkinson is a more physical blocker than Schultz. He uses his size and strength to seal off defenders and create running lanes. Schultz is a more athletic blocker, but he is not as strong as Parkinson.

Question 2: Who is the better receiver, Colby Parkinson or Dalton Schultz?

Schultz is a more polished receiver than Parkinson. He has better hands and is a better route runner. Parkinson is a good receiver, but he is not as consistent as Schultz.

Question 3: Who has more potential, Colby Parkinson or Dalton Schultz?

Parkinson has more upside than Schultz. He is younger and has more physical tools. However, Schultz is more experienced and has a better understanding of the game. It is difficult to say definitively who has more potential, but Parkinson has a higher ceiling.

Question 4: Who is the better player overall, Colby Parkinson or Dalton Schultz?

It is difficult to say definitively who is the better player overall. Parkinson has more upside, but Schultz is more experienced. Both players have their strengths and weaknesses. Ultimately, it depends on what each team is looking for in a tight end.

Question 5: Who will have the better career, Colby Parkinson or Dalton Schultz?

It is impossible to say who will have the better career. Both players have the potential to be elite tight ends in the NFL. However, there are many factors that will affect their careers, such as injuries, coaching, and team success. Only time will tell who will have the better career.

Summary

Colby Parkinson and Dalton Schultz are two of the most promising young tight ends in the NFL. Both players have the potential to be elite tight ends, but they have different strengths and weaknesses. It is difficult to say definitively who is the better player, but Parkinson has more upside, while Schultz is more experienced. Only time will tell who will have the better career.

Transition to the next article section

Now that we have discussed some of the most frequently asked questions about Colby Parkinson and Dalton Schultz, let's take a look at some of their key stats and accomplishments.

Conclusion

Colby Parkinson and Dalton Schultz are two of the most promising young tight ends in the NFL. Both players have shown flashes of brilliance in their young careers, and they both have the potential to be elite tight ends in the league. Parkinson has more upside, but Schultz is more experienced. Both players have their strengths and weaknesses, and it is difficult to say definitively who is the better player overall.

It will be interesting to see how the careers of Parkinson and Schultz develop over the next few years. They both have the potential to be stars in the NFL, and it will be fun to watch them compete against each other for years to come.